Colorado highlighted (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

From the Denver Post:

The Colorado Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that governors’ proclamations of a state Day of Prayer violate the Constitution’s provisions for religious liberty.

When the state sponsors the particular religious practice of prayer, the three-judge panel found, it sends a message that those who pray are favored members of Colorado’s political community.

"In doing so, they undermine the premise that the government serves believers and nonbelievers equally," Judge Steven Bernard wrote in a 73-page decision.

The content of six Colorado Day of Prayer proclamations, 2004 to 2009, is "predominantly religious," lacking a secular context or purpose, and the effect is "government endorsement of religion over nonreligion," Bernard wrote. Judges Alan Loeb and Nancy Lichtenstein concurred.

The lawsuit against the Colorado Day of Prayer was brought by the Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation. The foundation also attempted to shut down the US National Day of Prayer but were turned back by the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in 2011.

<Read the entire story>

Response: Hopefully the governor will appeal the ruling. The Colorado Day of Prayer is entirely voluntary and not really a forcing of a particular religion upon people in the state. Unbelievers are really not forced to participate and really are not harmed or affected in anyway unless they choose to be. 

Our religious heritage in this country continues to be under assault. Secularists and atheists continue to use constitutional passages that were meant to protect religious liberty in order to erase religion entirely from the public square. 

The Colorado Day of Prayer and similar events across the country in reality are not attempts to establish any kind of state religion. Not only that, no one really believes that they are. Nevertheless, activist groups like the Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation are using that legal language in order to destroy all vestiges of religion and displays of faith wherever they find them.

The effect is really not a question of establishment or favoring a particular religion but forcing the establishment of atheism as the new official state doctrine in Colorado and ultimately all across America.             *Top

Related Posts?:

1. -Federal Judge Rules ‘National Day of Prayer’ Unconstitutional
2. -National Day of Prayer Ruled Constitutional by Court of Appeals

(Photo by Brent Harris/WORLD on Campus)

An atheist student group set up a booth on a Texas university campus offering to exchange pornography for Bibles and other religious materials including Qurans.

According to Kyle Bush, the president of the student group- Atheist Agenda:

"The point is not to hand out porn, but rather the primary purpose is to get people to come talk to us so we can get our message out. We want to spread atheism and bring it more to the spotlight. We offer another alternative to people who might not fit in anywhere else."

The atheist group collected five Bibles, one Encyclopedia of Islam, and one Quran in exchange for porn during the 2 day event. Not exactly a raging success. They did create a little bit of attention for their cause but nothing like their first exchange in 2008 that gained international press.

Interestingly 30 yards away a Christian student group sang praise songs and bathed the event in Prayer.

Response: Events like this somewhat backfire on atheist groups. Rather than promoting their ideas in a forum of debate, events like this which ridicule the faith of others merely create attention but not necessarily good attention.

Do the atheists in this group really want to give the impression that they support porn as something that is good for society? Probably not. Do they really believe that porn is better than religion for our culture? Maybe, maybe not.

However, we do support their right to free speech and also the right of the Christian group nearby to sing and pray on campus. Hopefully the current rage on University campuses to regulate student leadership (called ‘anti-discrimination’) does not reach all the campuses across America and student groups remain free to express their views everywhere, including conservative non-PC Christian groups and even atheist groups which I obviously do not support.            *Top

Related Posts?:

1. -Catholic Student Group at Vanderbilt U. Forced Off Campus
2. -Anti-Semitism On a College Campus Near You

(Image via Wikipedia)

Did the 9/11/01 attacks end up changing some of our attitudes about religion?

In an article on my Apologetica page I make the point that it did in at least two significant ways:

1. Islam in America came out of the closet

2.Atheists also came out of the closet

<<Read my conclusions on my Apologetica page>>

*Top

Related Posts?:

1. Comparing Islam and Christianity #4 -The Holy Spirit
2. -Barack Obama’s Religion: How Muslims View It

American Atheists filed a lawsuit on Monday to have the iconic ‘Ground Zero’ Cross removed from the 9/11 Memorial and Museum in New York City.

The World Trade Center cross is made up of two intersecting steel beams found intact in the midst of the rubble created by the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks. The cross was displayed and dedicated on Saturday at the new 9/11 Memorial Museum.

The 17 foot tall cross was discovered by a construction worker after the Sept. 11 attacks and was the only thing left standing amid the rubble. It has become a symbol of the 9/11 attacks and an icon of hope.

According to 9/11 Memorial president Joe Daniels:

The cross is "an important part of our commitment to bring back the authentic physical reminders that tell the history of 9/11 in a way nothing else could."

"Its return is a symbol of the progress on the Memorial & Museum that we feel rather than see, reminding us that commemoration is at the heart of our mission."

The atheist organization is seeking to have the cross removed since it only represents one religion- Christianity.

Meanwhile, Byron Babione of the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) has responded to the atheists claims and suit with the following:

(the atheist group) is "completely out of step with the Constitution."

“One atheist group’s agenda shouldn’t diminish the sacrifice made by the heroes of 9/11. A cross like this one simply does not amount to a government establishment of religion under either the U.S. Constitution or the New York Constitution."

"The cross is not only known far and wide as a religious symbol, but also as a symbol of death, remembrance, and honor for the dead. Americans have long recognized this.”

The American Center for Law and Justice plans to respond to the law suit with a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the Ground Zero cross on behalf of a former 9/11 firefighter and first responder. According to Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the ACLJ:

"This is another pathetic attempt to rewrite the Constitution and rewrite history by removing a symbol that serves as a powerful remembrance to that fateful attack nearly 10 years ago. This lawsuit is deeply flawed and without merit. It is just the latest chapter of an anti-God strategy employed by atheist organizations across the country—a strategy offensive to millions of Americans, a strategy that we’re confident will ultimately fail in court."

Response: Here we go again. These kind of cases are rarely won by those who want to take down memorial crosses. When judges do render in their favor they are overturned in appeal. A case in point is the Mohave Desert Memorial Cross. Courts eventually ruled that it could stay in the national park and did until some ‘activist’ took it down and stole it.

The 9/11 cross became an inspiration to millions -that even in the midst of so much destruction an accidental symbol of hope was found that defined the feelings of millions of folks that no matter what the American spirit could not be broken. Do you really want to take away a poignant symbol like this which stands defiantly against those who want to destroy our way of life including our freedoms and particularly our freedom of religion?

Besides, the cross is not the only religious symbol displayed in the 9/11 Memorial Museum. Why pick on it only?

My question is this- Why do atheists who complain about the intolerance of others towards them want to get caught up in cases like this that are intolerant of the feelings of so many others. Exactly where is the harm and how is it really an establishment issue?

There are crosses displayed in every veterans national cemetery all across the country along with other religious symbols. Do they really want to eventually rip the crosses literally off of the graves of veterans who served their country well?

I recently visited Arlington National Cemetery, there were huge crosses all over the place. Some had been there for over a hundred and fifty years. Do these really need to be torn down in the name of separation of church and state? What about the graves decorated with the Star of David? Do those need to be desecrated also?

The real question is this- does the establishment clause in the Constitution do away with religion and the public exercise there of? No. In fact it is suppose to protect our religious freedom from legislation that would hinder it. At least that was the original intent of the framers who thought nothing of halting their deliberations on a number of occasions to seek the guidance of the Creator.            *Top

Related Posts?:

1. -Supreme Court: Mojave Memorial Cross Can Stay
2. -9th Circuit Rules Mt. Soledad Cross Unconstitutional

     (Getty Images via @daylife)

British scientist Stephen Hawking who is considered one of the smartest people in the world has come out and called heaven a "fairy story" for people afraid of the dark.

In an interview with The Guardian (UK Newspaper ) on Monday, Hawking said that his views were affected and influenced by his battle with motor neurone disease:

"I have lived with the prospect of an early death for the last 49 years. I’m not afraid of death, but I’m in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first," he told the newspaper.

"I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark."

Lately Stephen Hawking has increasingly become vocal in his atheistic stances. In his earlier works he actually allowed for the possibility of a creator. However in his latest book, "The Grand Design", he said that a deity no longer has any place in theories on the creation of the universe from his perspective.

Response: Hawking is a brilliant scientist when it comes to physics. However when it comes to issues of philosophy, metaphysics, and theology he is somewhat lacking.

His statement demonstrates an acceptance of materialistic theory, that everything that is human can be explained and accounted for totally in the physical elements that make up the human body.

However, some of the greatest minds that the world has ever known have believed that not everything that makes up a human can be accounted for materialistically in the physical body. Many believe that a better explanation of human existence includes the possibility of a non-physical element. That living humans are a composite which includes the physical body and something other –a spirit or soul.

The idea of a continued existence after the death of the physical body is rooted in the metaphysical and religious teaching of most of the major world religions, that humans have a spirit or soul that exists independent of the physical body.            *Top

Related Posts?:

1. ‘Gospel of Judas’: Is It Authentic? -The Theological Test
2. -Christianity Without Christ and a Personal God?

The American Atheists Org. put up a billboard coming into NY City (on route 495 at Kennedy Blvd on the NJ side of the Lincoln Tunnel) with the message:

You KNOW it’s a Myth

This Season, Celebrate REASON!

And so the battle over Christmas begins.

Here’s the reason they spent a huge amount of money to put this message out. From the American Atheist website:

The purpose of the billboard is threefold:
1) To address those atheists who “go along to get along”, and to encourage them to come out of their closets
2) To attack the myth that Christianity owns the solstice season
3) To raise the awareness of the organization and the movement.

Response: I thought long and hard about exposing this billboard further. Writing about it actually helps to spread their message that only few driving along Route 495 in New jersey would have seen. However since it is now sort of all over the place on the web and even on TV news shows it is probably best now to look at the message and respond.

First of all their attack on the ‘myth’ that ‘Christianity owns the solstice season’ is completely wrong. Commercialism and malls have over taken Christianity when it comes to Christmas a long time ago. So the atheists have their own ‘myth’ going.

Secondly, their claim that the celebration of Christmas revolves around a ‘Myth’ is somewhat true when you consider Santa Claus, Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer, Frosty the Snowman and other features that have become part of the celebration.

Even the choice of December 25 came much later and definitely is not the real date of the first Christmas. Also, the ‘Wisemen’ probably showed up and visited the Christ Child a year or so after the event according to scripture.

Thirdly, if you really want to celebrate reason this season and take all of the myth out of it, read the actual Biblical accounts of the birth of a baby in Bethlehem that changed history for all time:

In Matthew (Mt 1:18-2:18) and in Luke (Lk 1:26-56, 2:1-40).

*Top of the Blog

Related Posts?:

1. -‘God Is’ Billboard Replaces Atheist One
2. -Atheists Say ‘Bah Humbug’ with Billboard Campaign

(Capitol Visitor Center via Wikipedia)

A federal court on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit to eliminate the National Motto –“In God We Trust” and the Pledge of Allegiance from being displayed in the US Capitol Visitor Center in Washington, D.C.

US District Judge William M. Conley ruled that the atheist group-Freedom from Religion Foundation did not have any legal standing to bring the lawsuit in the first place.

The motto and the pledge were supported in court by the American Center for Law and Justice who represented 50 members of Congress in the case. Jay Sekulow, chief counsel was pleased with the outcome:

“This challenge was another misguided attempt to alter history and purge America of religious references. The National Motto and the Pledge of Allegiance displayed in the Capitol Visitor Center merely echo the sentiments found in the Declaration of Independence. In our view, Congress acted appropriately by including these expressions in the center — expressions that are consistent with the Constitution.”

Response: The assault on religion in the public square continues but fortunately was thwarted in this case. When the center opened the Pledge was no where to be found and the supposed motto displayed was not the official one at all. There were even pictures of the Congress chamber where the motto- “In God We Trust” had been photo-shopped out. Obviously the original designers of the visitors center were trying to eliminate all references to ‘God’ on purpose.

The congress voted to address that slight then the Freedom from Religion Foundation group sued to take God out of the picture again. For once a judge refused to participate in judicial activism and honored the duly elected representatives of the people who supported the opinions of their constituents and brought God back to the capitol.

Related Posts?:

1. -“In God We Trust” Now on Display in the Capitol Visitors Center
2. -God is Edited Out of the MLK Memorial